IKE~多预共享密钥问题~解决方案

2023-10-23 20:08

本文主要是介绍IKE~多预共享密钥问题~解决方案,希望对大家解决编程问题提供一定的参考价值,需要的开发者们随着小编来一起学习吧!

原文链接:Configuring more than one Main-Mode Pre-Shared Key (PSK) *dialup* IPSec phase1

可能需要梯子来翻过高墙。文章内容如下:

Technical Note :

Configuring more than one Main-Mode Pre-Shared Key (PSK) *dialup* IPSec phase1 on a Fortigate

Description

This article explains a limitation inherent to IKE when trying to configure multiple IPSec phase1 in Pre-Shared Key (PSK) mode.

If you configure more than one *dialup* phase1 in Main Mode PSK on the same FortiGate port (IP),  then the same phase1 will always be matched by ALL dialers. The error will show up in the third Main Mode round (authentication) as per the example below :

2009-11-04 16:00:00 device_id=FGTxxx  log_id=0101023003 type=event subtype=ipsec pri=error loc_ip=aa.bb.cc.dd loc_port=500 rem_ip=ee.ff.gg.hh rem_port=500 out_if="wan1" vpn_tunnel="branchOffice" cookies=asd2345sdf4sdf345 action=negotiate status=negotiate_error msg="Negotiate SA Error: probable pre-shared secret mismatch"

When multiple *dialup* Main Mode PSK phase1 exist, IKE has no way to know which phase1 must be matched upon receipt of the first main mode packet :

  • the source IP (dialer's IP) cannot be used as a distinguisher (any source IP is allowed for dialup phase1)
  • the destination IP (FGT's IP) cannot be used as a distinguisher (we have assumed that all dialup phase1 were bound to the same FGT IP)
  • there isn't any payload in the first Main Mode packet which would allow to select a specific phase1

Consequently, the first phase1 in IKE internal list is always matched.
This is not a FortiOS limitation

The PSK itself is part of the phase1 root key (SKEYID) calculation.
This root key is then derived into two keys (SKEYID_e, SKEYID_a) which are used for the phase1 encryption and authentication.
Phase1 keys are therefore dependent on the PSK.

When the phase1 initiator sends the MI3 message (fifth Main Mode message) it is protected with its locally calculated SKEYID_e/SKEYID_a. If the phase1 which was chosen by the responder is not the correct one, then SKEYID_e and SKEYID_a on the responder are different from those on the initiator therefore leading to a failure ('probable PSK mismatch' in the 'debug ike') because the responder is unable to decipher the initiator's packet.

Scope

All FortiOS

Solution

To work around this Main Mode PSK limitation for multiple dialup connections :

  • use aggressive mode with ID (ID is sent in clear text in the first Aggressive Mode message and can therefore be used by the responder to select the correct phase1)
  • use Main Mode with RSASIG


Main Mode RSASIG doesn't suffer this limitation and still offers ID protection :
Upon receipt of the first Main Mode message, the IKE responder picks up the first dialup Main Mode RSASIG phase1 in its list. If it is not the correct phase1, it is not an issue.
When MI3 message will reach the IKE responder, it will be able to authenticate and to decipher it because SKEYID_a/e keys don't depend on the phase1 specification (the root SKEYID is based on payloads that were exchanged between each peer (nonces) and on the Diffie-Hellman private shared key that was locally computed by each peer).
Once the MI3 message is decrypted, the IKE responder finally knows the ID of the initiator (which by default is the DN of the initiator certificate) and can therefore "fallback" to the correct phase1 if needed.

这篇关于IKE~多预共享密钥问题~解决方案的文章就介绍到这儿,希望我们推荐的文章对编程师们有所帮助!



http://www.chinasem.cn/article/270170

相关文章

线上Java OOM问题定位与解决方案超详细解析

《线上JavaOOM问题定位与解决方案超详细解析》OOM是JVM抛出的错误,表示内存分配失败,:本文主要介绍线上JavaOOM问题定位与解决方案的相关资料,文中通过代码介绍的非常详细,需要的朋... 目录一、OOM问题核心认知1.1 OOM定义与技术定位1.2 OOM常见类型及技术特征二、OOM问题定位工具

Python一次性将指定版本所有包上传PyPI镜像解决方案

《Python一次性将指定版本所有包上传PyPI镜像解决方案》本文主要介绍了一个安全、完整、可离线部署的解决方案,用于一次性准备指定Python版本的所有包,然后导出到内网环境,感兴趣的小伙伴可以跟随... 目录为什么需要这个方案完整解决方案1. 项目目录结构2. 创建智能下载脚本3. 创建包清单生成脚本4

java.sql.SQLTransientConnectionException连接超时异常原因及解决方案

《java.sql.SQLTransientConnectionException连接超时异常原因及解决方案》:本文主要介绍java.sql.SQLTransientConnectionExcep... 目录一、引言二、异常信息分析三、可能的原因3.1 连接池配置不合理3.2 数据库负载过高3.3 连接泄漏

Vue3绑定props默认值问题

《Vue3绑定props默认值问题》使用Vue3的defineProps配合TypeScript的interface定义props类型,并通过withDefaults设置默认值,使组件能安全访问传入的... 目录前言步骤步骤1:使用 defineProps 定义 Props步骤2:设置默认值总结前言使用T

C#文件复制异常:"未能找到文件"的解决方案与预防措施

《C#文件复制异常:未能找到文件的解决方案与预防措施》在C#开发中,文件操作是基础中的基础,但有时最基础的File.Copy()方法也会抛出令人困惑的异常,当targetFilePath设置为D:2... 目录一个看似简单的文件操作问题问题重现与错误分析错误代码示例错误信息根本原因分析全面解决方案1. 确保

Web服务器-Nginx-高并发问题

《Web服务器-Nginx-高并发问题》Nginx通过事件驱动、I/O多路复用和异步非阻塞技术高效处理高并发,结合动静分离和限流策略,提升性能与稳定性... 目录前言一、架构1. 原生多进程架构2. 事件驱动模型3. IO多路复用4. 异步非阻塞 I/O5. Nginx高并发配置实战二、动静分离1. 职责2

解决升级JDK报错:module java.base does not“opens java.lang.reflect“to unnamed module问题

《解决升级JDK报错:modulejava.basedoesnot“opensjava.lang.reflect“tounnamedmodule问题》SpringBoot启动错误源于Jav... 目录问题描述原因分析解决方案总结问题描述启动sprintboot时报以下错误原因分析编程异js常是由Ja

C# LiteDB处理时间序列数据的高性能解决方案

《C#LiteDB处理时间序列数据的高性能解决方案》LiteDB作为.NET生态下的轻量级嵌入式NoSQL数据库,一直是时间序列处理的优选方案,本文将为大家大家简单介绍一下LiteDB处理时间序列数... 目录为什么选择LiteDB处理时间序列数据第一章:LiteDB时间序列数据模型设计1.1 核心设计原则

MySQL 表空却 ibd 文件过大的问题及解决方法

《MySQL表空却ibd文件过大的问题及解决方法》本文给大家介绍MySQL表空却ibd文件过大的问题及解决方法,本文给大家介绍的非常详细,对大家的学习或工作具有一定的参考借鉴价值,需要的朋友参考... 目录一、问题背景:表空却 “吃满” 磁盘的怪事二、问题复现:一步步编程还原异常场景1. 准备测试源表与数据

解决Nginx启动报错Job for nginx.service failed because the control process exited with error code问题

《解决Nginx启动报错Jobfornginx.servicefailedbecausethecontrolprocessexitedwitherrorcode问题》Nginx启... 目录一、报错如下二、解决原因三、解决方式总结一、报错如下Job for nginx.service failed bec