IKE~多预共享密钥问题~解决方案

2023-10-23 20:08

本文主要是介绍IKE~多预共享密钥问题~解决方案,希望对大家解决编程问题提供一定的参考价值,需要的开发者们随着小编来一起学习吧!

原文链接:Configuring more than one Main-Mode Pre-Shared Key (PSK) *dialup* IPSec phase1

可能需要梯子来翻过高墙。文章内容如下:

Technical Note :

Configuring more than one Main-Mode Pre-Shared Key (PSK) *dialup* IPSec phase1 on a Fortigate

Description

This article explains a limitation inherent to IKE when trying to configure multiple IPSec phase1 in Pre-Shared Key (PSK) mode.

If you configure more than one *dialup* phase1 in Main Mode PSK on the same FortiGate port (IP),  then the same phase1 will always be matched by ALL dialers. The error will show up in the third Main Mode round (authentication) as per the example below :

2009-11-04 16:00:00 device_id=FGTxxx  log_id=0101023003 type=event subtype=ipsec pri=error loc_ip=aa.bb.cc.dd loc_port=500 rem_ip=ee.ff.gg.hh rem_port=500 out_if="wan1" vpn_tunnel="branchOffice" cookies=asd2345sdf4sdf345 action=negotiate status=negotiate_error msg="Negotiate SA Error: probable pre-shared secret mismatch"

When multiple *dialup* Main Mode PSK phase1 exist, IKE has no way to know which phase1 must be matched upon receipt of the first main mode packet :

  • the source IP (dialer's IP) cannot be used as a distinguisher (any source IP is allowed for dialup phase1)
  • the destination IP (FGT's IP) cannot be used as a distinguisher (we have assumed that all dialup phase1 were bound to the same FGT IP)
  • there isn't any payload in the first Main Mode packet which would allow to select a specific phase1

Consequently, the first phase1 in IKE internal list is always matched.
This is not a FortiOS limitation

The PSK itself is part of the phase1 root key (SKEYID) calculation.
This root key is then derived into two keys (SKEYID_e, SKEYID_a) which are used for the phase1 encryption and authentication.
Phase1 keys are therefore dependent on the PSK.

When the phase1 initiator sends the MI3 message (fifth Main Mode message) it is protected with its locally calculated SKEYID_e/SKEYID_a. If the phase1 which was chosen by the responder is not the correct one, then SKEYID_e and SKEYID_a on the responder are different from those on the initiator therefore leading to a failure ('probable PSK mismatch' in the 'debug ike') because the responder is unable to decipher the initiator's packet.

Scope

All FortiOS

Solution

To work around this Main Mode PSK limitation for multiple dialup connections :

  • use aggressive mode with ID (ID is sent in clear text in the first Aggressive Mode message and can therefore be used by the responder to select the correct phase1)
  • use Main Mode with RSASIG


Main Mode RSASIG doesn't suffer this limitation and still offers ID protection :
Upon receipt of the first Main Mode message, the IKE responder picks up the first dialup Main Mode RSASIG phase1 in its list. If it is not the correct phase1, it is not an issue.
When MI3 message will reach the IKE responder, it will be able to authenticate and to decipher it because SKEYID_a/e keys don't depend on the phase1 specification (the root SKEYID is based on payloads that were exchanged between each peer (nonces) and on the Diffie-Hellman private shared key that was locally computed by each peer).
Once the MI3 message is decrypted, the IKE responder finally knows the ID of the initiator (which by default is the DN of the initiator certificate) and can therefore "fallback" to the correct phase1 if needed.

这篇关于IKE~多预共享密钥问题~解决方案的文章就介绍到这儿,希望我们推荐的文章对编程师们有所帮助!



http://www.chinasem.cn/article/270170

相关文章

javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException:异常原因及解决方案

《javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException:异常原因及解决方案》javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException是一个SSL握手异常,通常在建立SS... 目录报错原因在程序中绕过服务器的安全验证注意点最后多说一句报错原因一般出现这种问题是因为目标服务器

C++高效内存池实现减少动态分配开销的解决方案

《C++高效内存池实现减少动态分配开销的解决方案》C++动态内存分配存在系统调用开销、碎片化和锁竞争等性能问题,内存池通过预分配、分块管理和缓存复用解决这些问题,下面就来了解一下... 目录一、C++内存分配的性能挑战二、内存池技术的核心原理三、主流内存池实现:TCMalloc与Jemalloc1. TCM

MyBatis Plus 中 update_time 字段自动填充失效的原因分析及解决方案(最新整理)

《MyBatisPlus中update_time字段自动填充失效的原因分析及解决方案(最新整理)》在使用MyBatisPlus时,通常我们会在数据库表中设置create_time和update... 目录前言一、问题现象二、原因分析三、总结:常见原因与解决方法对照表四、推荐写法前言在使用 MyBATis

MySQL 设置AUTO_INCREMENT 无效的问题解决

《MySQL设置AUTO_INCREMENT无效的问题解决》本文主要介绍了MySQL设置AUTO_INCREMENT无效的问题解决,文中通过示例代码介绍的非常详细,对大家的学习或者工作具有一定的参... 目录快速设置mysql的auto_increment参数一、修改 AUTO_INCREMENT 的值。

关于跨域无效的问题及解决(java后端方案)

《关于跨域无效的问题及解决(java后端方案)》:本文主要介绍关于跨域无效的问题及解决(java后端方案),具有很好的参考价值,希望对大家有所帮助,如有错误或未考虑完全的地方,望不吝赐教... 目录通用后端跨域方法1、@CrossOrigin 注解2、springboot2.0 实现WebMvcConfig

Go语言中泄漏缓冲区的问题解决

《Go语言中泄漏缓冲区的问题解决》缓冲区是一种常见的数据结构,常被用于在不同的并发单元之间传递数据,然而,若缓冲区使用不当,就可能引发泄漏缓冲区问题,本文就来介绍一下问题的解决,感兴趣的可以了解一下... 目录引言泄漏缓冲区的基本概念代码示例:泄漏缓冲区的产生项目场景:Web 服务器中的请求缓冲场景描述代码

Java死锁问题解决方案及示例详解

《Java死锁问题解决方案及示例详解》死锁是指两个或多个线程因争夺资源而相互等待,导致所有线程都无法继续执行的一种状态,本文给大家详细介绍了Java死锁问题解决方案详解及实践样例,需要的朋友可以参考下... 目录1、简述死锁的四个必要条件:2、死锁示例代码3、如何检测死锁?3.1 使用 jstack3.2

解决JSONField、JsonProperty不生效的问题

《解决JSONField、JsonProperty不生效的问题》:本文主要介绍解决JSONField、JsonProperty不生效的问题,具有很好的参考价值,希望对大家有所帮助,如有错误或未考虑... 目录jsONField、JsonProperty不生效javascript问题排查总结JSONField

html 滚动条滚动过快会留下边框线的解决方案

《html滚动条滚动过快会留下边框线的解决方案》:本文主要介绍了html滚动条滚动过快会留下边框线的解决方案,解决方法很简单,详细内容请阅读本文,希望能对你有所帮助... 滚动条滚动过快时,会留下边框线但其实大部分时候是这样的,没有多出边框线的滚动条滚动过快时留下边框线的问题通常与滚动条样式和滚动行

github打不开的问题分析及解决

《github打不开的问题分析及解决》:本文主要介绍github打不开的问题分析及解决,具有很好的参考价值,希望对大家有所帮助,如有错误或未考虑完全的地方,望不吝赐教... 目录一、找到github.com域名解析的ip地址二、找到github.global.ssl.fastly.net网址解析的ip地址三